AICPDF Files Petition Against Quick Commerce Players Alleging Unfair Pricing and Market Monopoly
- March 6, 2025
- Brandz Editor Team
- 0

The All India Consumer Products Distributors Federation (AICPDF) has filed a petition with the Competition Commission of India (CCI), accusing quick commerce players such as Blinkit, Zepto, and Swiggy Instamart of engaging in unfair pricing practices and monopolizing the market. The petition alleges that these fast-growing quick commerce platforms are distorting competition through deep discounts and exclusive supply or distribution agreements, which could have serious implications for both consumers and traditional retailers.
Unfair Practices and Market Manipulation
Quick commerce, also known as hyperlocal delivery, has become a significant part of the e-commerce ecosystem, providing rapid deliveries of products, often within minutes of placing an order. This service model is gaining massive traction, particularly in urban areas, as consumers are increasingly looking for convenience and instant gratification. However, according to the AICPDF, this growth comes at the cost of fair competition and market integrity.
In its petition, the AICPDF outlined that quick commerce companies, in a bid to rapidly capture market share, have resorted to deep discounting strategies, which are unsustainable in the long run. These companies are offering steep discounts on a range of products, which the federation claims is skewing the market dynamics in favor of larger players and pushing out smaller, traditional retailers. The AICPDF contends that these deep discounts are predatory in nature, intending to drive competition out of business rather than offering genuine value to consumers.
Furthermore, the association pointed out that quick commerce platforms have been entering into exclusive supply and distribution agreements with suppliers, thereby limiting the access of local retailers to certain products. This practice, according to the petition, further strengthens the market hold of quick commerce players and reduces the availability of products for the traditional retail segment.
Impact on Traditional Retailers
The petition underscores the detrimental impact that these practices are having on traditional consumer goods distributors and retailers. AICPDF members argue that the exclusive agreements between suppliers and quick commerce companies are creating a situation where smaller retailers are unable to compete on equal footing. The ability of quick commerce platforms to deliver products quickly and at discounted prices makes it increasingly difficult for these distributors to maintain their customer base.
Moreover, these quick commerce players are gaining a larger share of the market by leveraging their technological infrastructure and access to venture capital. With the backing of significant funding, these companies can afford to operate at a loss, further challenging local businesses that operate on much thinner margins. The AICPDF believes that without regulatory intervention, this could lead to a significant imbalance in the market, favoring a few large players over the broader retail ecosystem.
The Role of the CCI
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) is responsible for investigating anti-competitive practices in the market, including unfair trade practices, price manipulation, and monopolistic behavior. The AICPDF is urging the CCI to examine the business strategies of quick commerce companies to determine whether they violate competition laws. The petition raises concerns that if left unchecked, the market could see a consolidation of power in the hands of a few large players, stifling competition and hurting both consumers and smaller businesses.
The rapid growth of the quick commerce sector has undoubtedly transformed consumer shopping habits, offering speed and convenience that traditional retail models struggle to match. However, the AICPDF’s petition raises important questions about the long-term sustainability of such models and the potential harm they may cause to market competition. It remains to be seen how the CCI will respond to the concerns raised by the federation and whether further regulatory measures will be implemented to ensure a level playing field in the market.
Conclusion
As quick commerce platforms continue to gain popularity, concerns about fair competition and market monopolization are becoming more pronounced. The petition filed by AICPDF with the Competition Commission of India highlights the need for careful scrutiny of business practices in the fast-growing sector. With deep discounts and exclusive agreements potentially harming smaller retailers, it is essential to find a balance that supports innovation without compromising market fairness. The outcome of this petition could shape the future of India’s quick commerce industry and ensure that competition remains healthy and sustainable.