In a significant development, the Maharashtra government has directed Swiggy, one of India’s leading food delivery platforms, to pay INR 7.59 crore in back taxes for alleged violations related to the deduction of Profession Tax from employee salaries. The tax demand order was issued by the Office of the Profession Tax Officer in Pune on April 4, and the company confirmed the same in an exchange filing.
The authorities allege that Swiggy failed to adhere to the requirements set forth under the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings & Employments Act, 1975, which mandates employers to deduct and remit the profession tax from their employees’ salaries. This tax is levied on individuals engaged in any profession, trade, calling, or employment in the state of Maharashtra.
Profession tax is applicable to all salaried employees, and the tax amount varies depending on the salary level. The violation allegations primarily revolve around Swiggy’s failure to comply with the mandatory deductions from its employees’ wages and the proper submission of those payments to the authorities.
Swiggy has not made an official statement regarding whether the company intends to contest the demand or plans to settle the outstanding amount. However, given the size of the tax demand, the company may explore options such as appealing the decision or negotiating a payment plan.
The Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings & Employments Act, 1975, has been in force for decades and obligates businesses to ensure that profession tax is deducted from the monthly salaries of employees working in the state. This issue is significant as it impacts a large number of employees in various sectors, including the burgeoning food tech industry, and could set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
Swiggy, known for its dominant presence in the Indian food delivery market, has been operating in Maharashtra for several years and employs thousands of workers, both in customer service and delivery roles. The company’s compliance with state tax laws has come into question, and the back tax demand is likely to raise concerns about how tech-driven businesses are managing their financial obligations.
This incident is not isolated, as other food delivery and gig economy companies have also been under the tax authorities’ radar for similar compliance-related issues. As these companies expand their presence across India, they face increasing scrutiny from tax authorities in various states, especially regarding their compliance with labor and tax regulations.
For Swiggy, this development could impact its reputation and financial performance. However, it may also prompt the company to review its internal processes for employee tax deductions to ensure compliance with Maharashtra’s laws going forward.
In conclusion, the Maharashtra government’s order for Swiggy to pay INR 7.59 crore in back taxes for alleged violations of profession tax laws underlines the growing importance of tax compliance, particularly for fast-growing companies in the digital economy. With more scrutiny being placed on the foodtech sector and gig economy businesses, it’s crucial for these companies to streamline their operations and adhere to local tax laws to avoid such legal issues in the future. Swiggy, like other companies in its sector, will likely face increased vigilance from tax authorities across India, making tax compliance a critical focus in the years to come.